Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. Protects National City Mortgage From an Erroneous Metes and Bounds Description
In Deutsche Bank v. Narvaez, et. al., Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. was able to procure a discontinuance of the insured National City Mortgage from the action, thereby successfully protecting the bank’s interests from the plaintiff Deutsche Bank’s neighboring foreclosure action without having to appear in or defend the action.
In this Kings Supreme Court action, National City Mortgage, by virtue of an erroneous metes and bounds description in the plaintiff Deutsche Bank’s mortgage, was named as a subordinate lien holder in the action.
Instead of expending unnecessary legal fees on a motion to dismiss, Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. was able to craft a stipulation, which sufficiently protected the interests of National City Mortgage, while still having National City Mortgage discontinued from the action.
Jackie Halpern Weinstein of the Title Litigation Group at Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. won this case for the insured.